Qrius
  • Economy
  • Culture & Society
  • Science & Technology
  • World
  • Content Services
  • Economy
  • Culture & Society
  • Science & Technology
  • World
  • Content Services
31 Dec, 17
31 Dec, 17

Why engines are measured in horsepower

We owe this unit of engine power measurement to Scottish engineer James Watt.

By Qrius

By Daven Hiskey

Daven is an author at Today I Found Out.


We owe this unit of engine power measurement to Scottish engineer James Watt.

Read moreThe tussle between Science and Religion

In the early 1780s, after making a vastly superior steam engine to the then classic Newcomen steam engine, Watt was looking for a way to market his invention, advertising the fact that his engine used about 75% less fuel than a similarly powered Newcomen, among many other improvements.

At first, he tried selling his engine on a royalty scheme, where the customers would owe him one-third of the money they saved by using his engine over other steam engines. Of course, many at the time used horses, not steam engines, so it was difficult to compare without them actually buying the engine to see how it would perform for their particular usage. Thus, he scrapped the royalty scheme and decided to try a different tack to convince people to buy his engine.

Ever the inventor, his solution was to come up with a new unit of measurement that those in need of his engine understood -horse power, referring to powerful draft horses.

Read moreTo Infinty and Beyond: Quantum Computing

Thus, he set about determining how much power a typical draft horse could generate. It isn’t known exactly how he came up with the numbers he did, as there are conflicting accounts of the experiments he ran. But after doing those experiments, he figured out a typical draft horse could do about 32,400 foot-pounds of work in 60 seconds and maintain that power rate for a good long workday. He then rounded up, going with 33,000 foot-pounds per minute for 1 horsepower.

So, in other words, by his estimation a good draft horse could lift 33,000 pounds of material 1 foot in 1 minute or 3,300 pounds of material 10 feet in one minute, etc .

In truth, that’s a very generous estimate as very few horses could maintain that kind of power for a full workday, but getting a perfect figure wasn’t that important to what Watt was trying to do. Further, by overestimating what a horse could do, whether intentionally or not, he made sure that his product would always over deliver what he said when trying to get people to buy it, which is a great word-of-mouth marketing trick.

Read moreImmodest Hermes: Messaging System

In the end, Watt’s engine was revolutionary and played a huge role in the Industrial Revolution. Thanks to this fact, his unit of measure of an engine’s power, horsepower, also became popular. Funny enough, today the SI unit of power, the Watt, which was named in homage to James Watt, has widely come to replace “horsepower” in most applications.


This article was originally published on Today I Found Out.

Featured Image Credits: Pixabay


Stay updated with all the insights.
Navigate news, 1 email day.
Subscribe to Qrius

what is qrius

Qrius reduces complexity. We explain the most important issues of our time, answering the question: "What does this mean for me?"

Featured articles

1

Abstract

The Everlasting Allure of ‘The Double Life of Veronique’
2

‘Women are not just for sex’ says Kangana Ranaut as she hits back at fmr Cabinet Minister
3

India’s Monthly Economic Review: FY24 Outlook Bright, Fundamentals Strong, Global Headwinds
4

Where are we in the fight against ‘homosecularism,’ the belief that sexuality and religion are at odds?
5

Supreme Court refuses woman?s plea to medically terminate her 26-week pregnancy
6

How ‘Birkenstock’ built on its brand and broke bank
7

Israel-Hamas Conflict: Tackling false claims and misleading content in violence-hit Gaza
8

Humans of Bombay founder Karishma Mehta pens note on controversy with People of India
9

How did a ‘bus shelter’ go missing in Bengaluru?
10

Che Guevara

Why is Che Guevara’s image still invoked in pop culture?
About UsContributorsBecome a ContributorContact
2018 QRIUS. All Rights Reserved