Now Reading:

Lack of Paradigm Shift Undermines New Education Policy

Lack of Paradigm Shift Undermines New Education Policy

By Divya Agarwal

The TSR Subramaniam Committee’s report on National Policy on Education, 2016 was leaked to the media recently. The 230-pages report is a detailed account of the various aspects of education in India. It also contains recommendations to make them more effective and beneficial to students. The policy had long been awaited with bated breath by educationalists, the teaching fraternity, policy advocates and others involved in the education sector as a possible instrument of positive change.

The last National Policy on Education was released in 1986. Needless to say, the education sector has come a long way since then.

Major advances in technology and a shift in the objectives of education have brought in crucial developments that need to be assimilated into our nation-wide policies.

Unfortunately, the National Policy on Education, 2016, has failed to achieve these rather obvious objectives.

The Committee’s Defence

In its defence, the Committee did lay immense emphasis on the need to integrate technology into pedagogy as well as data management in the sector. It also talks about instituting Open & Distance Learning (ODL) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to reach adult learners or students who may be engaged in jobs and do not have the time to attend a full-time university course. In addition, capacity building in the form of training teachers to use technology and improving the teaching courses available so as to attract better personnel, all seem to be in the right direction. The Committee has also taken a grave view of the lack of accountability in the current system.

Meaningful Suggestions

An outstanding suggestion is the setting up of a special tribunal to deal with service and administrative matters. This effectively speeds up the process of resolving disputes and ensures that schools and more importantly, students, are not left hanging in limbo. Another welcome recommendation is the shift to learning outcomes as an indicator of development in education. The report has rightly berated the fact that governmental efforts until this point have been concentrated on establishing more and more schools when there are multitude of schools running with 20 students or less. It has been recommended that learning outcomes become a factor in recognition of schools and teacher and principal promotions.

What is important to note here is that all these goals that the committee has set out can only be accomplished some way in the future.

The Lows of Committee’s Suggestions

The report glaringly lacks solutions to the immediate problems of the education sector. The matter of Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act, for example, has been given minimal importance. The report only makes a general recommendation to continue with the law set down in the clause. The widespread problem of low or no reimbursements to private schools for admissions under this section has been passed off as a ‘work in progress’.


Striving for effective education policy | Photo Courtesy: Pixabay

Directions to state governments to rectify this have not even made it to the recommendations. The model of direct beneficiary transfers, so favoured by the central government in various schemes, has managed to escape the thoughts of the Committee. Furthermore, the report has focused exclusively on the development and improvement of the government schooling system without any reforms touching upon the growing private sector in education. In fact, the government bias against private educational institutions clearly comes across as they are disparagingly referred to as ‘teaching shops’.

In fact, the government bias against private educational institutions clearly comes across as they are disparagingly referred to as ‘teaching shops.

The Ignorance of Necessary Paradigm Shift

The Committee, instead of limiting the role of the government, has sought to make it even greater by the introduction of the Indian Education Service. Centralization of power has already caused government schools to lag miles behind private institutions. In times when the government is opening up various sectors and markets to even foreign entities, it is a pity that education is being held so close to its chest as to stifle progress and innovation. Public-private partnerships, which some states have already begun considering, barely received a mention by the esteemed Committee.

The Committee has made a brave attempt to call out the successive governments in failing to fix the systemic errors in the education sector such as corruption, lack of accountability, the undue importance of rote learning and the insignificance of quality of education etc. Despite this, it has wholly ignored the need for a paradigm shift in the field of education from being a government-provided social service to a competitive market fostering innovation. The very fact that the prominence of the burgeoning private school sector has been virtually ignored in the report makes it a deficient approach, based not in reality or research, but the government’s unwillingness to let the people have an education of their choice.

Divya has completed her B.A, L.L.B from Symbiosis Law School, Pune. After a brief stint in the Legal department of TATA AIG, she has made the switch to CCS owing to a keen interest in public policy and law. She likes exploring new places and meeting new people.

This article was originally published on Spontaneous Order.

Featured Image Credits: Pixabay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Input your search keywords and press Enter.