Now Reading:

Is The Moment More Important Or The Memory Of Its Perfection?

Is The Moment More Important Or The Memory Of Its Perfection?

By  Aneesha Puri

How can an instant seem like  an eternity?!  Yet those who have experienced it would know that it can. The nineteenth century  French philosopher  Henri Bergson in his path breaking  work titled Matter And Memory attempted to explain the experiencing of time by classifying it into  two categories- Chronological Time which conforms to the rigid demarcations  of hours, days, months and years  and Psychological Time which is a more fluid conceptualisation of time and deals with  one’s intuitive response to the passing of hours, days, months and even years and explains  the inevitable  back and forth movement in  time that the sight, sound or even smell of something remembered fondly or detested badly  can spark in our consciousness. Moments last for either  too long or not long enough  and deep down this is accompanied with the implicit awareness  that nothing lasts forever.  So how do you explain the experiencing of time or can it be rationalised at all? Does  the tripartite division of past, present and future contribute to simplifying the overwhelming conundrum or only add to the time chaos?  Fundamentally  memories denote the past, anticipations stand for  the future and actuality  connotes the present  but they are all so unbelievably intermingled that you cannot clearly comprehend the connectivity between the three or tell one from the other because the linear measured movement of time is often not in sync with fluid subjective experiences.

The contemporary urge to post the images of cuisine you had last night on social networking sites is an altogether different league of frivolity to preserve the so called moment and has  in fact irredeemably  ridiculed the whole notion of transforming the moment into  photographic memories.  But if we go beyond the social networking sites and transcend  the social media compulsions and brood over how the present thrives on the past, then how can you completely discredit the significance of memories, especially when life often makes more sense in retrospect. If  life is all about the fuss of having the climactic moment,  then would not you want to treasure the moment by capturing it into impeccable memories?

Chronological charting of time rarely dovetails with psychological experiencing of  time and the primary reasons for this contradiction are memories and anticipations. Memories  and  anticipations  simultaneously perform the functions of sustenance and torment and this further complicates the understanding and experiencing  of  time. In this overwhelming  time puzzle, when memories, ongoing moments and anticipations co-exist in such  irremediable concoction, how can you even tell  whether the moment is more important or the memory of its perfection?!   So perhaps  as  Henri Bergson famously remarked  “The pure present is an ungraspable advance of the past devouring the future. In truth, all sensation is already memory. ”

Aneesha  Puri  is pursuing her Masters in English Literature from Miranda House. A self-confessed book- ravisher , keen surveyor of  society and its ideological politics, loves deconstructing and decoding  anything and everything that even remotely concerns people,  ranging from  celebrated, canonical literary texts to popular cinema and advertisements.  Her idea of utopia is a truly emancipated world which allows everyone, unfettered freedom to foster  his/ her potential to the maximum.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Input your search keywords and press Enter.