About Us Contributors Let's Talk Subscribe Sitemap
Qrius
  • Economy
  • Culture & Society
  • Politics
  • Science & Tech
  • Content Services
  • Economy
  • Culture & Society
  • Politics
  • Science & Tech
  • Content Services
09 Jan, 18
09 Jan, 18

Can paid menstrual leave work against gender parity?

Earlier this week, a bill seeking two days of paid menstrual leave every month for women employees in government institutions was moved in Lok Sabha.

By Qrius

By Tamanna Inamdar


Earlier this week, Lok Sabha Member of Parliament Ninong Ering moved a private member’s bill seeking two days of paid menstrual leave every month for women employees in government institutions. The Menstruation Benefit Bill, 2017 asks for compulsory leave, 30-minute breaks twice a day during four days of menstruation and overtime for women who choose to not avail of this leave.

Most Indian companies provide 12 days of casual leave per year, often used when an employee is unwell. But MP Ninong Ering thinks this is just not enough. “It is just a question of two days,” says the lawmaker from Arunachal Pradesh “What happens when she is down with flu or viral fever,” he asks.

While private member’s bills rarely become law, this particular proposal has sparked a heated debate on whether menstrual leave should be implemented.

More than 50 percent of the respondents to BloombergQuint’s Twitter poll said they were in favor of menstrual leave.

MP Ninong Ering moves a private member bill asking for 2 days leave for women employees during menstruation. Are you in favour?

You can catch the results live on Primetime debate at 8.30 pm. #BQLive

— BloombergQuint (@BloombergQuint) January 5, 2018

But Sonal Arora, vice-president at human resource firm TeamLease finds the proposal problematic. “I am not sure if giving a blanket two-day leave will be taken well,” she says. Demand for additional leave for female employees, according to her, may work against gender parity at the workplace and dissuade companies from hiring women in the first place.

There will probably be an unconscious bias against hiring women in the first place and companies may not acknowledge it but it will come in.

Sonal Arora, Vice-President, TeamLease Services

“I don’t think menstruation is an illness,” says Women’s Rights Activist Ranjana Kumari. The government should instead focus on addressing a long-standing demand to reduce the Goods and Services Tax on sanitary napkins and invest in menstrual hygiene and health.

If we provide good nutrition to any robust, healthy body, such an issue will not rise. We must invest in menstrual health, hygiene, awareness.

Ranjana Kumari, Director, Center For Social Research

What The Menstruation Benefit Bill, 2017 Proposes


The article was originally published on Bloomberg Quint.

Featured Image: Pixabay


Stay updated with all the insights.
Navigate news, 1 email day.
Subscribe to Qrius

what is qrius

Broaden your horizons as unpack fresh trends shaping our lives. Qrius delivers fresh, immersive writing that answers the question 'Why should I care?'

daily updates in your inbox

Start your mornings with the acclaimed 'Qrius Mornings' newsletter that gives you our best article of the day right in your inbox.

Featured articles

1

Beethoven’s 250th Birthday: analysis of the composer’s letters proves that creativity does spring forth from misery
2

Ever Heard Of ‘Life Porn’? You May Well Be Living It
3

Rumination In The Time of Isolation
4

It’s Not Easy Being Handsome
5

Ain’t No Sunshine When He’s Gone
6

How Empaths Become The Narcissists’ Narcissists
7

Rich, Please: How The Pleas Of India’s Wealthy Seem ‘Fake’ To The Masses
8

Going ‘Inception’ On The ‘Editorial’
9

Anglo-Indians: Are They Fading into the History of India?
10

Music

Indian Music…and all that Jazz
About Us Contributors Let's Talk Subscribe Sitemap
2018 QRIUS. All Rights Reserved